I believe that leadership can be segregated into two basic styles / categories: make me, or make me want to.
The make me style focuses on telling people what to do, how to do it and when to do it. It is dictation / dictatorship. It can be effective in accomplishing goals, but will never empower individuals to strive for more or greater results. Leadership that falls in this camp must continuously apply their authority and influence in order to maintain results. Results end the moment the pressure disappears.
The make me want to style focuses on explaining the reason why – the rationale behind what we are trying to accomplish. It is inspirational and leads to exponential growth of the what, or desired results and goals.
The differences between these two camps are much more significant than we typically realize. I like the analogy of communism to capitalism, where the make me model is communism, and the make me want to is capitalism. History has perfectly demonstrated the oppressive and destructive consequences of communism and the limitless possibilities of capitalism.
I once had a boss tell me to "do it or he would find someone else that will." Definitely make me.
I have also had the opportunity to work with many leaders that provided guidance and direction with heavy emphasis on the explanation of why, but focused most of their energy on recognition of ideas, effort and results. They all made me want to!
We can't always pick our leaders and if you find yourself under the leadership of a make me leader, it does not have to be hopeless. Move beyond his or her dictation by discovering the why behind what you are being commanded to do. It is virtually impossible to do something with any passion for which you do not understand the purpose. Ask questions; seek to understand why you are doing what you are doing. Then, motivated by this inspiring knowledge, exceed the desired result or goals. Go beyond what is expected – or dictated. You just may find yourself going beyond that person that is doing the dictating.
Posts
